Deployment of wireless lan in a university campus: a full coverage plan for Nnamdi Azikiwe University Akwa
1 James agajo 2 Sylvester Ehijie Ezewele 3 Awolo C. I.
Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Federal Polytechnic, Auchi, Edo state
Nigeria
Phone: +2348053312732
agajojul@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
Wireless technologies represent a rapidly emerging area of growth and importance for providing ubiquitous access to the network for the campus community. Students, faculty and staff increasingly want undeterred network access from general-purpose classrooms, meeting rooms, auditoriums, and even the hallways of campus buildings. In this paper, a full coverage plan and the technological details involved in the deployment of wireless LANs based on the IEEE 802.11 standard in a university campus is presented using Nnamdi Azikiwe University Permanent Site as a Model. In this coverage Plan, (the University master plan is consulted) about 3 base station (Access Point) is to be deployed, covering an estimated 60 buildings spanning through the entrance gate to the heart of the campus ;Administrative section to all faculties and department buildings and indeed all habitable part of the campus permanent site. To ensure a good coverage, multidirectional antennae in the 2.4GHZ and 5GHZ free frequency band is used. Data security will be ensured by using reliable and dependable software based on WAP .At the end of the work the University would have been completely networked and a secured INTRA NET created. Consequently, data transfer within the campus, would become seamless.
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study
Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN) are implemented as an extension to wired LANs within a building and can provide the some meters of connectivity between a wired network and the mobile user. In wireless LANs the computers or nodes are linked to one another by radio. Each computer contains a sophisticated modem that both transmits and receives over a short distance. Each wireless node is linked backed to a server that makes the connection between nodes. Over the years a number of wireless LANs have been developed and abandoned
There are three physical layers for WLANs: two radio frequency specifications (RF – direct sequence and frequency hopping spread spectrum) and one infrared (IR). Most WLANs operate in the 2.4 GHz license-free frequency band and have throughput rates up to 2Mbps. The new 802.11b standard is direct sequence only, and provides throughput rates up to 11 Mbps. Currently the predominant standard, it is widely supported by vendors such as Cisco, Lucent, Apple, etc.
2.0 Technology Standards
Manufacturers have adopted many competing standards for implementing wireless communication. Interoperability between different communications standards is gradually improving. It is important to evaluate, with any wireless LAN networking system, the technology it uses, the features it provides and the industry support it has.(Please refer to chapter four, for hardware specification to be used in the coverage plan).Below are common standards available:
IEEE 802.11b is sometimes referred to as “Wi-Fi”. Currently this open standard, developed by the Wireless Local Area Networks Standards Working Group, is the most widely used wireless LAN system. Large technology companies such as Linksys, Apple, SMC, and 3Com have adopted it for their product lines. This technology uses radio waves in the 2.4-GHz frequency band (same as many other appliances such as cordless phones and microwaves) and has the potential for interference. Speed ranges from 1-11Mbps (newer products are most often specified at 11Mbps).
IEEE 802.11a: is a standard that may replace 802.11b in years -Speed can reach 54 Mbps and travels on the less congested 5GHz band, reducing the potential for interference. Range is limited to 50 feet. More speed but likely more Access Points required. Some vendors are producing Access Points that will adapt to both the 11b and 11a standards as well as other standards (Hyperlinks, Proxim and Agere, Mikrotik are examples).
Bluetooth is an inexpensive, very low-powered and short-range frequency-hopping radio system that would link your pagers, personal access devices, cell phones, and laptops (designed for small, mobile devices). The potential for interference (shares 2.4 GHz frequency), particularly to the low-powered Bluetooth, remains an open problem. Range is only 30 feet but line of sight is not necessary – the distance limitation is a problem for serious LAN implementation, and not many Bluetooth LAN systems have been developed as a result. Named after the 10 century Danish King Harald, “Bluetooth” is the English translation of his last name “Blatand.” King Harald was famous for uniting the kingdoms of Denmark and Norway and for his extensive travels; like King Harald, Bluetooth unites separate entities (peripherals, laptops, PDAs, Cellophanes, cameras, etc).
3.0 Methodology
The university master plan cannot be displayed entirely in this work without taking a sizeable space in this work, therefore for simplicity of the coverage plan
Key:
1, 2, 3=Business Admin& Marketing Block 9=Natural Science
4=Afrihub 10=Science Village
5=Central bank building 11=Social Science
6=Utility building 12=Law Faculty
7=Engineering Block 8=Administrative Block Departments Around
3.1 Structural analysis and the design Method.
The target areas has been designated as hotspot, distance of separation between one hotspot to another is estimated to be an average of about 8KM (Obtained by driving around the hotspot with a car).The line of sight distance between the hotspot is estimated at much lesser distance of about 4KM (Without Obstacles).Fortunately the equipment to be deployed in the coverage is rated by the manufactures to have a range of about 10-20KM on amplification depending on the topology of the location. Hence the key to effective coverage lies on proper deployment of the Access Point in the hotspot in other to cover the estimated distance between the hotspot. Bearing this in mind, I calculated that since the distance between the hotspot is less than the line of sight distance between the equipment to the deployed, very effective coverage could be ensured if the base stations are located in the hotspot in a way that obstacles are avoided. Hence the need for the use of altimeter to determine the best location for the installation of the base station arises. A Friend of mine (A Rigger) who works with one of the GSM companies was at hand to lend me his services in determining this best location. Consequently three locations were map out to give the best immediate coverage. Details are shown in chapter five were the coverage plan was presented. Also ability to easily and cheaply provide power supply to the base stations and security of the base station were also taking into consideration in selecting these locations.
The height recommended overcoming adverse topography and avoiding unnecessary obstacle is about 160M.Thus the height of the mast to be used in mounting the directional antennae is about 160M
4.0 DESIGN SPECIFICATION
The network being deployed in the coverage plan will have a capacity of 1500 users simultaneously and can be expanded by software upgrade.
The system specification for the coverage plan is divided into two parts: the hardware and the software specification .This chapter begins by showing detail of hardware specification and later concludes with software specification i.e. The operating system (OS) to be installed at the server to ensure maximum data security and software recommended for billing, value added services and bandwidth management to optimize the speed of the network.
The key to the success of this coverage plan is to have a few number of base stations in other to ensure easy maintenance and amplify the signal from the base to maximum power possible so that reception is ensured at all parts of the campus environment and beyond and then use power full bandwidth management software to optimize the speed of the network.
The primary advantage of this approach is that it is easier to provide regular power, security and regular maintenance to less number of base stations (AP) than to many; hence the overall cost of providing the service is drastically reduced.
Consequently, the design approach will be as follows: a primary or main base station will be situated at the same location with the V-SAT (where the internet connection is made), Three or Four amplified secondary or repeater base station will be situated in the different “hotspot” (location where coverage is required ) as extension of the main connection point.
4.1 Hardware Specification
From the foregoing, The Main base station or Access Point (AP) will ultimately consist of the following equipment:
Main or Primary Base Station
System Unit and Monitor
Wireless Router Board
350mW Wireless Radio Card
3 Way Splitter
Jumper Cable/ Coaxial Cable With F connectors
A Coil of RJ45 networking cable
vii. Wireless Amplifier Radio
500W Uninterruptible Power Supply
12V/200Ah Battery
160M Mast
3×120” Sector Antennae and accessories
xii. A broadband V-SAT link to the Internet
Coaxial Surge arrestor kit
Power Over Ethernet Adapter (PoE ) Power Injector
xv. Bandwidth Management Software
While the secondary or Repeater base station will consist of the following:
Repeater or Secondary Base Station
Wireless Router Board
350mW Wireless Radio Card
3 Way Splitter
Jumper Cable/Coaxial Cable With F connectors
A Coil Of RJ45 Networking Cable
Wireless Amplifier Radio
500W Uninterruptible Power Supply
vii. 12V/200Ah Battery
160M Mast
3×120” Sector Antennae
Power Over Ethernet Adapter (PoE ) Power Injector
xii. Coaxial Surge Arrester Kit
Below are the details of the technical specifications of some of the hardware mentioned above
4.2 Wireless Router board
Wireless router board with level 5 license (Mikrotic is the preferred manufacturer)
Note: Level 5 license implies that the board has a capacity of 500simultenous users
Specifications:
Frequencies:
802.11b/g 2.312 – 2.497 (5 MHz step);
802.11a 4.920 – 6.100 (5 MHz step)
Chipset: Atheros AR5414
Security: Hardware 64 and 128 bit WEP; Hardware TKIP and AES-CCM
Encryption; 802.1x WPA authentication
Modulation: 802.11b+g: DSSS, OFDM for data rate >30Mbps
802.11a: OFDM
Host Interface: Mini-PCI form factor; Mini-PCI Version 1.0 type 3B
suggested only for motherboards that are produced after 2004
Power requirements: 3.3V +/- 10% DC; 400mA max (300mA typ.)
Output Power / Receive Sensitivity:
IEEE 802.11a: 17dBm/-88dBm @ 6Mbps
13dBm/-71dBm @ 54Mbps
IEEE 802.11b: 19dBm/-95dBm @ 1Mbps
19dBm/-90dBm @ 11Mbps
IEEE 802.11g: 18dBm/-90dBm @ 6Mbps
15dBm/-73dBm @ 54Mbps
Transfer Data Rate: 802.11b:11,5.5,2,1 Mbps, auto-fallback
802.11g (Normal mode):54, 48, 36, 24,18,12,9,6 Mbps, auto-fallback
802.11g (Turbo mode):108, 96,72,48,36,24,18,12 Mbps, auto-fallback
802.11a (Normal mode):54, 48, 36, 24,18,12,9,6 Mbps, auto-fallback
802.11a (Turbo mode):108, 96,72,48,36,24,18,12 Mbps, auto-fallback
Supported OS Mikrotik RouterOS, Windows XP
Operation Temp.: 0°C to 50
Humidity range: Operating 5% to 95% (non-condensing)
Protocol: CSMA/CA with ACK architecture 32-bit MAC
Connectors: Two U.fl connectors
Weight: 20 grams
4.3 350mW Wireless Radio Card:
This works with the router board to generate the electromagnetic signal fed into the Antennae through the Wireless Amplifier radio. The 350mW rating is sufficient since the signal will undergo amplification. The card is capable of generating signal in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency band.
Below is the wireless card attached to the router board, the card with the protruding wire is the wireless card. The terminal end connects to the antenna through the amplifier. The wireless card is rated 350mW
4.4 500W Inverter Power Supply:
The base station equipment mentioned above do not consume much power as can be seen from their technical data, consequently, a 500W Inverter power supply be sufficient to power the base station. However the inverter should be able to provide up to 20hrs of power supply to the base station in the event of power failure from the public supply therefore it recommended that up to four 12/200AH battery be connected to ensure the expected long duration supply. In addition if solar panels are available, they can also be connected to charge the batteries as alternative energy source.
4.5 4×90” Sector Antennae and accessories:
The antennae are critical in ensuring very good coverage within the campus environment
Specifications
4.6 A broadband V-SAT link to the Internet:
Since there is an exiting V-SAT link in Afrihub-NAU owned by the university, it may no longer be necessary to provide a different link in this coverage plan. The site survey also shows a mast located close to the V_SAT link bearing apparently, a WLAN installation, all that will be required to do is to make use of the mast, link the WLAN to the existing V-SAT link then expand the V-SAT bandwidth from the internet service provider (ISP) if the bandwidth is too narrow for the expected traffic from WLAN network, then install the bandwidth manager with the billing system in the server. Details are shown in chapter five where the plan is presented.
4.7 Client equipment:
Wireless Client adapter connects users via an access point to the rest of the LAN. The user will require one or two of the following;
(i) PCMCIA wireless card for laptop in cases where the laptop does not contain an onboard wireless adapter
(ii) PCI Wireless Card for desktop user since most desktop do not contain an onboard card.
(iii) Outdoor radio if there is no signal or the quality of the signal received is poor.
5.0 SOFTWARE SPECIFICATION:
Operating System: Linux (Fedora) May be preferable as the operating system for the sever, Its Primary advantage includes (i) immunity to virus attack apparently due to the fact that many scammers concentrate attack to Windows base OS. (ii) Ability to provide device driver for many hardware is also an additional advantage. Incompatibility with many value added software pack is the main drawback of this OS.
Nevertheless, windows based OS (XP and Vista) especially windows Vista can equally prove formidable to virus attack when supported with a reliable anti virus software and regularly updated.
Optionally, Mikrotik provides OS for Router board they manufacture called Mikrotik RouterOS; the only problem with this is incompatibility with other software which may be installed in the server to provide value added services such as Voice over WLAN. However the Mikrotik RouterOS comes with its own value added package though this may not contain all the features present in other third party value added software pack
5.1 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
In this work I was able to present a workable coverage plan for the deployment of wireless LAN in 2.4 and 5Ghz frequency band based on IEEE 802.11 b&g standard in Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka Permanent site
The network so designed will be able to accommodate video streaming and voice over internet facility.
It is noteworthy to mention here that maintenance (corrective and preventive) is as important as the deployment, thus the network if deployed and regularly maintained will ever remain stable.
REFERENCE
[1] Altera Corporation, Implementing Traffic Managers in Stratix II Devices, January 2004.
http://www.altera.com/literature/wp/wpstxiitrfc.pdf
[2] Eugene Chang, Bill Lu, Felix Markhovsky, RLDRAMs vs CAMs/SRAMs, June 2000
[3] 2004.http://www.commsdesign.com/design_corner/showArticle.jhtml?articleI D=16501400
[4] Kevin Cackovic, 90-nm FPGAs handle 10-Gbit traffic management tasks,
March 01,2004.http://www.eetimes.com/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=18311195&sub_taxonomyID=2579
[4] http://www.wikipedia.org 2008
[5] http://www.ieee.org, 2008
[6] http://www. GirlGeeks /Computer Networking Wireless LAN.htm
[7] Frenzel, Principle of Electronic Communication 2002
http://www.bukisa.com/articles/191936_deployment-of-wireless-lan-in-a-university-campus-a-full-coverage-plan-for-nnamdi-azikiwe-university-akwa